勛圖tv 繚 ENGINEERING GUIDE
Arlon 84HP: Filled Polyimide for Thick-Copper Gaps
Arlon 84HP is a filled polyimide prepreg intended for demanding fill regions such as etched thick-copper layers and clearance holes in metal cores. Its task is different from selecting a finished copper-clad laminate. A useful 84HP review starts with the volume and shape of the gap, then addresses process and verification.
The Arlon material overview covers the family. This page owns the filled-prepreg and local-clearance problem, keeping 84HP distinct from 85HP and other similarly named systems.

Identify what the filler system is intended to do
The official 84HP sheet describes micro-fine fillers used to reduce shrinkage and inhibit cracking in filled clearance areas. It reports an X-Y CTE matched to copper at 17 ppm/簞C and a Tg statement at or above 250簞C. These material-level statements do not prove that every large gap will fill without voids.
The gap geometry, reinforcement, material quantity and process all contribute to the result. Preserve the exact supplied form and source revision. Do not replace a core requirement with 84HP prepreg merely because the thermal headline looks suitable.
Evidence and construction decision
| Item | Source or model boundary | Action for the design review |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 84HP filled polyimide prepreg | Do not substitute 85HP core properties. |
| Application | Thick-copper and metal-clearance filling | Local occupancy does not specify resin charge. |
| Tg / Td | ���250簞C / 430簞C typical | Keep source and process clarification with the build. |
Draw the largest and most constrained clearance regions
Show thick-copper height, local coverage, metal-core openings and the intended dielectric interval. Identify the smallest vent path and the locations where a later hole will pass through the filled region. Average copper coverage alone can hide the feature that controls manufacturability.
The fill must satisfy more than a volume balance. Adhesion, voiding, shrinkage and the condition of a subsequently drilled wall may matter. State which representative locations and acceptance criteria will be examined in the build review.
| Review item | What to establish |
|---|---|
| Local geometry | 84HP thick-copper and metal-clearance sections. |
| Later process | Identify holes drilled through filled regions. |
| Source clarity | Resolve 85N/85HP references in public sheet. |
| Model limit | Occupancy is not resin demand or fill approval. |
Use the occupancy worksheet without treating it as a resin recipe
The tool adds the clearance beside copper to the continuous separation above it. For hypothetical inputs of 10,000 mm簡 area, 70 繕m copper height, 40% coverage and 100 繕m separation, total geometric occupancy is 1,420 mm糧.
This is not the quantity of resin to purchase. Reinforcement, filler, available resin, flow and cure behavior are not modeled. A positive volume calculation cannot select a ply count or prove that a metal-core clearance will be fully filled.

Connect filling to later drilling and thermal exposure
A region that looks filled before drilling may reveal different issues after a hole is produced and metallized. Identify the drilling path and required wall condition in the qualification plan. Thermal excursions can also expose defects that an initial visual inspection does not detect.
For the surrounding polyimide construction, 33N or 35N have separate source and process contexts. Any combination must be approved as a complete material and manufacturing proposal, not assembled from unrelated property tables.
Separate dimensional control from gap filling
45NK addresses woven-aramid dimensional control. Its low in-plane expansion does not make it a substitute for a filled polyimide prepreg. When both functions appear in a design, define the responsibilities of each material and the interfaces between them.
The public 84HP sheet has an availability table with 85N-prefixed entries and a process line naming 85HP. Obtain supplier clarification before treating those entries as an exact 84HP order or traveler instruction. Source scrutiny is part of a usable manufacturing handoff.
Copper-clearance volume illustration
Copper-clearance volume illustration
Use the current inputs and keep the assumptions
Start with the example only to inspect the units and the calculation boundary. Replace every assumption with a value tied to your own document or measurement. An empty numeric field is not zero. The review-reference field is a local label; avoid entering customer names, confidential part numbers or other private information into a public worksheet.
After calculating, read the notes alongside the numerical result. Changing any input invalidates the displayed result and disables its download until you calculate again. For a comparison, keep the units, geometry, material condition and measurement boundary consistent. A long decimal result does not imply equally precise input data. The downloadable record stays on your device and can be attached manually to an inquiry. It is not automatically transferred into the Contact form.
If an input is unknown, identify the person or document needed to resolve it. Do not fill a gap with a favorable generic value simply to obtain a result. You can request a material or fabrication review without using the tool. The arithmetic illustrates a relationship; it does not accept a construction, certify a material, establish current pricing or replace a supplier process specification.
| Input | What to establish before using it |
|---|---|
| Review reference | Nonconfidential revision label. |
| Evaluated bond area 繚 mm簡 | Panel or coupon area with consistent pattern coverage. |
| Copper feature height 繚 繕m | Height of the one patterned surface being evaluated. |
| Retained copper coverage 繚 % | Area fraction occupied by copper on that surface. |
| Final separation above copper 繚 繕m | Ideal continuous bondline above the highest copper; excludes roughness and glass. |
Optional cost comparison from your own allowances
Use a quotation or a clearly labeled internal assumption for each input. Keep the quantity, construction and inspection scope the same when comparing alternatives. This uncalibrated planning model adds entered values; it contains no current market rates and does not issue a 勛圖tv quotation. You can contact the team without completing it.
Optional project allowance comparison
Ask for a fill-region review before a firm production quote
Provide cross-sections, copper artwork, metal clearances, planned holes, final thickness and thermal history. State the exact material restriction and required evidence at the difficult locations. Include quantities and permitted alternatives.
The allowance worksheet contains no current 84HP rate. Compare complete proposals including special layup, inspection and qualification. The useful outcome is an agreed fill construction and evidence plan; the local geometric model does not certify crack resistance, void-free filling or finished-board reliability.
Review supplied form, local geometry and process together
A stackup is an agreement about physical construction, not just a vertical list of copper layers. Give each dielectric interval an identity and distinguish cured core thickness from the pressed thickness of bonding material. State whether copper is included in every quoted dimension.
Review the implications of a material change across impedance, lamination, drilling, registration and assembly exposure. A replacement with a similar headline Tg or Dk can still require a different geometry or process. Preserve the approved layer order, copper distribution assumptions and measurement basis with the manufacturing files.
Use the worksheet to organize a review, then obtain the fabricator's proposed construction and tolerances. Close differences before release. The final stackup, drawing and procurement material list should reference the same revision, especially when multiple suppliers or repeat orders are involved.
Bonding materials cannot be selected from a cured-laminate table alone. Establish whether the product is woven-glass prepreg, another reinforced bonding system or resin-coated copper. Each form has a different relationship between its supplied condition and the finished dielectric interval. Preserve the exact product and source revision in the proposed build.
Local copper distribution matters. Average coverage can conceal a large clearance region, a thick copper transition or a difficult target area. Supply the actual artwork and identify the locations that drive filling, registration or opening requirements. A single global thickness or aspect ratio does not characterize every local feature.
Process guidance should be applied by the responsible manufacturing team to the actual construction. A public document does not replace press-load qualification, handling controls or an approved drilling and metallization route. Do not use a generic bake or cure instruction for an unidentified bonding material.
Agree how the critical features will be verified. Representative cross-sections, dimensions and appropriate electrical or reliability evidence answer different questions. Keep the selected locations and acceptance requirements with the drawing so that a successful easy region is not mistaken for evidence about the most demanding feature.
Standards, source context and limits
Use the edition, amendment and material-document revision named in the purchase agreement. A standards title, marketing label or supplier product family does not establish that a particular lot meets a requirement. Public summaries are useful for scope; the controlled specification and applicable test method govern acceptance.
The examples on this page are illustrative engineering scenarios. They are not 勛圖tv production records or guaranteed material values. Source links identify the organizations responsible for the referenced information. Confirm applicability to the exact grade, construction and test condition before carrying a number into a drawing or qualification report. Sources were reviewed on 3 October 2026. A public catalog search is not proof that an unlisted product never existed. Where the exact designation or current technical sheet could not be verified, this page provides a clarification workflow rather than an invented material specification. Current supply, construction availability and qualification remain separate questions.