Inspection engineering 繚 勛圖tv
PCB X-ray inspection for hidden assembly features
Define the hidden-joint question before choosing an X-ray method. Agree the views, regions, measurement definition and acceptance reference needed for BGA, QFN or other obscured features.
Share the product revision, required checks and expected records. Early questions are welcome.

What does a dark region in an X-ray image actually mean?
An X-ray image is a projection affected by the materials and geometry in the beam path. A feature may need additional angles or a different imaging method before it can be interpreted. An image alone does not establish electrical function or a universal pass/fail limit.
What does PCB X-ray inspection show?
PCB X-ray inspection uses differences in X-ray transmission to reveal features that ordinary cameras cannot see through. In an assembled board, the most common questions involve solder beneath BGA packages, bottom-terminated components, stacked structures or joints obstructed by surrounding parts. Image contrast can reveal geometry, missing material, bridges and void-like regions when the selected method provides sufficient resolution and separation.
An image is a measurement view, not a complete electrical or reliability verdict. Dense overlapping structures can conceal or imitate a feature in a two-dimensional projection. Interpretation depends on geometry, magnification, viewing angle, image processing and the expected joint construction. A normal-looking projection does not by itself prove wetting at every interface.
The practical first question is therefore ���what defect or feature are we trying to evaluate?��� An investigation of a suspected BGA bridge needs a different scope from a report on exposed-pad void distribution, a through-hole barrel-fill question or a sample comparison following a reflow change. Define those questions before choosing inspection locations and acceptance limits.
2D projection, angled views and CT
| Method | What it adds | What to clarify |
|---|---|---|
| 2D projection | A fast view of attenuation through the full thickness along the beam | Overlapping features and the defined measurement region |
| Angled or oblique views | Another perspective on joint shape and relative positions | Which angles are required and whether features remain distinguishable |
| Computed tomography or sectional reconstruction | Separation of structures through reconstructed sections | Resolution, artifacts, field of view, analysis effort and method availability |
A CT-capable equipment family does not establish that CT is included in a quotation. Specify the inspection method, number of locations, sample scope and report format with the supplier. illustrates how projection and sectional methods address different inspection tasks; its product capabilities should not be read as a 勛圖tv equipment specification.
Automated X-ray inspection, often called AXI, describes automation of acquisition and analysis. It does not remove the need to validate the recipe against the product or to review ambiguous findings. Offline investigation and inline screening serve different cycle-time and evidence needs.
BGA, QFN and through-hole questions
For a BGA, identify package locations, ball-map orientation and the particular arrays or joints that matter. Missing or unusually shaped projected solder features can guide an investigation. A suspected bridge may need another angle, electrical correlation or a section to resolve overlap. Head-in-pillow and interfacial separation can be difficult to establish from a simple top-down projection alone.
For a QFN or other bottom-terminated component, the exposed pad and perimeter terminations have different geometries. Define whether you want an overall projected void-area ratio, a largest-void measure, a location-sensitive assessment or another agreed metric. The thermal design and exact package recommendations may matter as much as an overall percentage.
Through-hole and press-fit features require their own inspection criteria. Barrel fill, internal damage and pin geometry are not interchangeable questions. Review the suitable method and access with the engineer instead of assuming that a standard BGA program will answer them. BGA assembly process planning and through-hole assembly planning help connect the inspection request to the manufacturing route.

Why one void percentage cannot accept every joint
A two-dimensional void-area ratio is the segmented projected void area divided by the defined projected joint region, multiplied by 100. It is not automatically a three-dimensional void-volume fraction. Changing the region of interest, threshold, overlap handling or imaging angle can change the reported number even when the physical joint is unchanged.
Record the definition before comparing results. Are separate pale regions combined? Are overlapping projected voids counted once? Is the denominator the full pad projection, the soldered region or another agreed boundary? Does the specification also constrain the largest void, distribution or a critical heat-flow location? Without these definitions, two reports with the same percentage may describe different conditions.
Do not apply a single web-sourced limit to every BGA, QFN or power package. The applicable product class, package construction, customer specification, device guidance and agreed IPC criteria must be considered together. Where a requirement is unclear, keep the finding open and request a disposition rather than letting an online calculator invent a pass threshold.
Build a useful X-ray inspection request
The inspection brief builder helps you describe what should be imaged and what evidence should return with the result. Select the feature, question and proposed method, then identify the scope and acceptance reference. Unknown requirements remain visible in the brief so that they can be resolved during engineering review.
X-Ray Inspection Brief
This tool does not upload or classify images, segment voids or diagnose hidden defects. That is deliberate: an engineering request with a defined region, method and criterion is more useful than a simulated ���AI pass��� based on an illustration. You can download the brief or open an email draft containing the entered requirements.
For a prototype investigation, describe the observed symptom, affected locations and whether comparable known-good units are available. For recurring production, specify whether the request concerns every unit, selected components on each unit, or a documented sample. These are different coverage statements and should appear clearly in the quotation.
Apply the right acceptance basis
IPC-A-610 is relevant to assembly acceptability; IPC-7095 addresses BGA design and process implementation, and IPC-7093 addresses bottom-terminated component implementation. Check the and use the agreed editions and applicable customer criteria. A document title alone does not assign a universal void limit or a mandatory X-ray sampling rate.
Keep the test method separate from the acceptance authority. An analyst may measure and flag a feature, while engineering or the customer decides disposition under the contract. If destructive analysis or additional electrical testing is needed to answer the question, identify the affected samples and obtain the appropriate project authorization.
Also identify components with X-ray exposure restrictions. Some devices or stored data may require manufacturer guidance on exposure and handling. The responsible inspection team should define a suitable acquisition plan; the page does not prescribe exposure settings or certify radiation safety.
From an image to a traceable decision
A useful report identifies the unit or lot, assembly revision, reference designator, inspected region, imaging method, acquisition view and criterion. Where a numeric value is reported, retain its units, region definition and analysis method. Include the finding, reviewer and disposition so the next engineer can understand what was accepted, reworked or escalated.
Repeat inspection after rework should be linked to the original finding and the approved rework record. Avoid replacing the original image without preserving the history. Comparison images are most useful when their acquisition conditions are sufficiently consistent to support the intended comparison.
Inspection cost is driven by programming, handling, imaging method, locations, sample quantity, analysis and reporting. CT investigation and a recurring screening recipe do not have identical economics. Ask for those scope elements to be stated in the quotation; a flat price per board without coverage details is difficult to compare.

Use AOI for visible assembly features alongside hidden-joint inspection. Add in-circuit test or functional testing when electrical behavior must be verified. The test-method comparison helps coordinate these routes without assuming that every method is automatically included.
For PCB Assembly enquiries, send the released files and the inspection brief together. Quality assurance and supplier review explains the wider discussion about records, acceptance and evidence.
Make the X-ray result reproducible
Use these fields to scope the report with your quotation. The table is a planning example, not a 勛圖tv test result or a promise that every record is included by default.
| Record item | Information to include | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Location and view | Unit, component, joint or region; projection angle and orientation | The same joint can appear different in another view. |
| Measurement definition | Region of interest, segmentation basis and numerator/denominator | Projected area and three-dimensional volume are different quantities. |
| Acceptance basis | Product requirement, applicable standard and approved interpretation | Do not apply one void percentage to every package. |
| Disposition | Image reference, reviewer, exceptions and approved next step | Uncertain features need a documented investigation route. |
Walk through an engineering example
Illustrative review: a QFN thermal pad shows several separate light regions. Report how the pad boundary and void regions were defined before interpreting a projected-area ratio. Also review the device guidance and agreed thermal requirement. A single ratio cannot establish the electrical connection, thermal performance or lifetime of the complete assembly.
Continue to combine imaging with appropriate electrical and functional tests.
The email link opens a draft for you to complete. Contact is a separate form; these pages do not send messages automatically.
Questions engineers and buyers ask
Can X-ray replace AOI?
No. X-ray is useful for hidden or overlapping structures, while optical inspection evaluates visible surface and component features. The methods have different visibility and interpretation limits.
Does a void mean the board must be rejected?
Not automatically. Apply the specified metric and acceptance requirement to the actual joint and application. Preserve the image and region definition so the finding can be reviewed.
Is 100% X-ray the same as inspecting every joint?
No. The statement may describe units screened while only selected components or locations are imaged. Specify both unit coverage and feature coverage.
Can you diagnose my board from one X-ray image?
One image may help localize a concern. A defensible diagnosis can require another view, known geometry, electrical evidence, the imaging conditions or further analysis.
Turn the inspection question into an agreed scope
Send the current files, product revision, quantity and the requirements that matter to your application. Identify any unfinished criteria so the engineering review can address them explicitly.
Request the method, coverage, acceptance basis and report format with your quotation. Tool briefs can support the discussion; the Contact form does not automatically receive this page���s entered data.
Engineering references reviewed September 2026. Illustrations explain methods; equipment photographs do not establish product-specific coverage, inspection results or certification.