勛圖tv 繚 ENGINEERING GUIDE
ITEQ IT-180GN: Prepreg Handling and Bond Review
ITEQ IT-180GN is present in historical manufacturer records as a bonding-sheet designation. For a purchasing or process engineer, the key task is to establish the exact material and its handling requirements before it enters a layup. The name alone does not establish a no-flow product or a universal press cycle.
This guide focuses on lot and exposure records. The ITEQ material hub covers wider selection; the exact IT-180GN source and intended bonding construction should stay together in the project record.

Separate historical identity from a current process sheet
The reviewed ITEQ corporate documentation includes IT-180GN BS. That record supports historical identity, not current inventory or a complete performance specification. It does not justify importing cure, flow or electrical values from another 180-series material.
Ask for the current technical and handling documents for the proposed supply. The IT-180I core and prepreg guide explains a different documented pairing. Shared family digits are not evidence that the materials can use the same press instruction.
Material facts and decision boundaries
| Item | Source or model context | What it does not establish |
|---|---|---|
| Historical form | IT-180GN BS | No no-flow property inferred. |
| Time model | Age and accumulated open exposure | Use supplier-defined allowances. |
| Disposition | Responsible process review | Time remainder does not release lot. |
Describe the bondline and surrounding features
Identify the surfaces to be bonded, copper heights, local clearances and any cavity or keep-out. The proposed bonding interval must fill the intended geometry while meeting electrical and mechanical requirements. An average copper percentage can hide a difficult local region.
Request the supplied form, glass style, resin content, lot and intended pressed thickness. If controlled flow is required, state the actual boundary and acceptance condition. Do not rely on the letters GN to establish that the product is no-flow.
| Review item | What to establish |
|---|---|
| Historical form | IT-180GN BS, with current source requested. |
| Local geometry | Bondline, copper relief and keep-outs defined. |
| Exposure record | Supplier-defined start and accumulated exposure. |
| Model limit | Remaining time does not release a material lot. |
Lot age and open-exposure worksheet
Lot age and open-exposure worksheet
Use the current inputs and keep the assumptions
Start with the example only to inspect the units and the calculation boundary. Replace every assumption with a value tied to your own document or measurement. An empty numeric field is not zero. The review-reference field is a local label; avoid entering customer names, confidential part numbers or other private information into a public worksheet.
After calculating, read the notes alongside the numerical result. Changing any input invalidates the displayed result and disables its download until you calculate again. For a comparison, keep the units, geometry, material condition and measurement boundary consistent. A long decimal result does not imply equally precise input data. The downloadable record stays on your device and can be attached manually to an inquiry. It is not automatically transferred into the Contact form.
If an input is unknown, identify the person or document needed to resolve it. Do not fill a gap with a favorable generic value simply to obtain a result. You can request a material or fabrication review without using the tool. The arithmetic illustrates a relationship; it does not accept a construction, certify a material, establish current pricing or replace a supplier process specification.
| Input | What to establish before using it |
|---|---|
| Review reference | Nonconfidential revision label. |
| Current lot age 繚 days | Elapsed calendar time against the supplier-defined start date. |
| Supplier-stated usable life 繚 days | Exact grade, packaging and storage conditions; not a generic recommendation. |
| Accumulated open exposure 繚 hours | Your tracked total for this package; resealing does not reset it. |
| Supplier-defined exposure allowance 繚 hours | Use only when a documented cumulative allowance applies to this grade. |
Optional cost comparison from your own allowances
Use a quotation or a clearly labeled internal assumption for each input. Keep the quantity, construction and inspection scope the same when comparing alternatives. This uncalibrated planning model adds entered values; it contains no current market rates and does not issue a 勛圖tv quotation. You can contact the team without completing it.
Optional project allowance comparison
Track time using the supplier's definitions
A usable-life clock needs a defined starting point, storage conditions and packaging state. Open exposure may require a separate record. Different products and environments can use different allowances, so the worksheet does not contain a built-in IT-180GN shelf life.
Enter only a documented allowance or label the scenario as hypothetical. If a package has been exposed several times, preserve the cumulative record where the supplier's instruction requires it. Repackaging or moving it to another storage area should not erase the prior history.

Interpret the time worksheet as arithmetic
The example uses an assumed 60-day age against 90 days and 3 hours of exposure against an 8-hour allowance. It reports 30 days and 5 hours remaining under those assumptions. These are not recommendations for IT-180GN and do not release a lot for use.
Temperature, humidity, packaging damage and previous processing remain outside the arithmetic. A material whose time allowance appears positive can still need disposition for another reason. Keep the responsible process decision separate from the calculated remainder.
Connect the handling record to the build sequence
For an HDI structure, the IT-168G2 opening review illustrates why local geometry and sequential processing need their own evidence. A valid storage record does not approve a via or bondline, and a successful coupon does not establish the history of every material lot.
If a source instead names IT-180H, resolve that identity before applying any IT-180GN instructions. The original callout, actual supply and approved process should agree before material is issued to the job.
Prepare a bonding-material inquiry with clear responsibilities
Send the exact designation, original source, proposed stackup, local geometry, quantity and expected assembly history. Ask for the relevant handling and processing documents, available constructions and any required qualification work.
Use the optional cost worksheet only with comparable quoted allowances. It contains no prepreg market rates or spoilage prediction. The useful response identifies the material, process responsibilities and unresolved conditions rather than promising performance from a historical name alone.
Review supplied form, local geometry and process together
A stackup is an agreement about physical construction, not just a vertical list of copper layers. Give each dielectric interval an identity and distinguish cured core thickness from the pressed thickness of bonding material. State whether copper is included in every quoted dimension.
Review the implications of a material change across impedance, lamination, drilling, registration and assembly exposure. A replacement with a similar headline Tg or Dk can still require a different geometry or process. Preserve the approved layer order, copper distribution assumptions and measurement basis with the manufacturing files.
Use the worksheet to organize a review, then obtain the fabricator's proposed construction and tolerances. Close differences before release. The final stackup, drawing and procurement material list should reference the same revision, especially when multiple suppliers or repeat orders are involved.
Bonding materials cannot be selected from a cured-laminate table alone. Establish whether the product is woven-glass prepreg, another reinforced bonding system or resin-coated copper. Each form has a different relationship between its supplied condition and the finished dielectric interval. Preserve the exact product and source revision in the proposed build.
Local copper distribution matters. Average coverage can conceal a large clearance region, a thick copper transition or a difficult target area. Supply the actual artwork and identify the locations that drive filling, registration or opening requirements. A single global thickness or aspect ratio does not characterize every local feature.
Process guidance should be applied by the responsible manufacturing team to the actual construction. A public document does not replace press-load qualification, handling controls or an approved drilling and metallization route. Do not use a generic bake or cure instruction for an unidentified bonding material.
Agree how the critical features will be verified. Representative cross-sections, dimensions and appropriate electrical or reliability evidence answer different questions. Keep the selected locations and acceptance requirements with the drawing so that a successful easy region is not mistaken for evidence about the most demanding feature.
Standards, source context and limits
Use the edition, amendment and material-document revision named in the purchase agreement. A standards title, marketing label or supplier product family does not establish that a particular lot meets a requirement. Public summaries are useful for scope; the controlled specification and applicable test method govern acceptance.
The examples on this page are illustrative engineering scenarios. They are not 勛圖tv production records or guaranteed material values. Source links identify the organizations responsible for the referenced information. Confirm applicability to the exact grade, construction and test condition before carrying a number into a drawing or qualification report. Sources were reviewed on 3 October 2026. A public catalog search is not proof that an unlisted product never existed. Where the exact designation or current technical sheet could not be verified, this page provides a clarification workflow rather than an invented material specification. Current supply, construction availability and qualification remain separate questions.
For fabrication scope and the agreed construction requirements, see PCB manufacturing.