勛圖tv

勛圖tv 繚 ENGINEERING GUIDE

Panasonic R-2400 Film: Thermal Multilayer Filling

Panasonic R-2400 is a thermally conductive film intended for multilayer circuit-board construction. Its role includes filling around copper features while providing an insulating heat path. That is a different task from buying a cured thermal laminate sheet.

This guide focuses on local filling geometry and the evidence needed for a proposed build. Use the Panasonic portfolio for the surrounding material routes; this page does not claim a qualified 勛圖tv process merely because the film exists.

Underside of a pin-array semiconductor package
Underside of a pin-array semiconductor package. 勛圖tv site archive image; illustrative context, not a current inspection or ownership record.

Read the product introduction within its scope

Panasonic's May 2023 introduction reports a typical conductivity of 2.7 W/(m繚K), measured by laser flash, and describes multilayer and thick-copper applications. It also lists film thickness options at that time. The dated announcement is not current inventory confirmation.

Obtain the applicable controlled technical sheet, handling guidance and supply proposal for the actual construction. Any recognition or temperature statement must retain its material and test scope rather than becoming a finished-equipment service guarantee.

Panasonic R-2400 Film: bond material occupies copper-clearance space
Panasonic R-2400 Film: bond material occupies copper-clearance space. Original explanatory diagram; conceptual, not a released circuit or inspection record.

Construction decisions at a glance

Review focusEstablished contextDesign boundary
SourceMay 2023 product introductionCurrent supply separately confirmed.
Typical conductivity2.7 W/(m繚K), laser flashNot whole-board thermal resistance.
VolumeIdeal clearance plus separationNot film charge or press flow.

Show the local copper topography

Provide artwork, copper height and the locations with large clearance regions or step changes. Filling demand is local. A global percentage can conceal an empty region that requires much more material movement than the average suggests.

The final separation above the highest copper should be defined independently from the volume beside it. Mark the electrical and thermal features that depend on that separation. The design needs both adequate filling and the intended final geometry.

Review itemWhat to establish
ProductR-2400 thermal film, dated introduction and current TDS
GeometryLocal copper height, coverage and residual separation
VolumeIdeal occupancy, not resin charge or flow
BoundaryNo embedded-component or production capability assumed

Use the volume illustration for a bounded question

The worksheet adds the ideal clearance volume beside one patterned copper surface to a continuous separation volume above it. With 10,000 mm簡 area, 70 繕m copper, 40% retained coverage and 100 繕m separation, it gives 1,420 mm糧 of geometric occupancy.

That is not the required film charge or a prediction of flow. Reinforcement, fillers, roughness, resin movement, squeeze-out and process behavior are excluded. Use the result to communicate the geometry that needs review, not to prescribe a press recipe.

Ball-array package beside a populated board
Ball-array package beside a populated board. 勛圖tv site archive image; illustrative context, not a current inspection or ownership record.

Copper-clearance volume illustration

勛圖tv ENGINEERING

Copper-clearance volume illustration

Panasonic Material Engineering
Loading Copper-clearance volume illustration…
Using this tool & sharing results

Use the stated units, input limits and model assumptions. Results support an engineering discussion; they do not approve a design, process or production order.

After changing inputs, update the result before using it. Where a download or copy action is available, review that brief and attach or paste it into your enquiry. Opening Contact does not transfer these inputs or send a request.

How to use and share tool results

Use the current inputs and keep the assumptions

Start with the example only to inspect the units and the calculation boundary. Replace every assumption with a value tied to your own document or measurement. An empty numeric field is not zero. The review-reference field is a local label; avoid entering customer names, confidential part numbers or other private information into a public worksheet.

After calculating, read the notes alongside the numerical result. Changing any input invalidates the displayed result and disables its download until you calculate again. For a comparison, keep the units, geometry, material condition and measurement boundary consistent. A long decimal result does not imply equally precise input data. The downloadable record stays on your device and can be attached manually to an inquiry. It is not automatically transferred into the Contact form.

If an input is unknown, identify the person or document needed to resolve it. Do not fill a gap with a favorable generic value simply to obtain a result. You can request a material or fabrication review without using the tool. The arithmetic illustrates a relationship; it does not accept a construction, certify a material, establish current pricing or replace a supplier process specification.

InputWhat to establish before using it
Review referenceNonconfidential revision label.
Evaluated bond area 繚 mm簡Panel or coupon area with consistent pattern coverage.
Copper feature height 繚 繕mHeight of the one patterned surface being evaluated.
Retained copper coverage 繚 %Area fraction occupied by copper on that surface.
Final separation above copper 繚 繕mIdeal continuous bondline above the highest copper; excludes roughness and glass.

Optional cost comparison from your own allowances

Use a quotation or a clearly labeled internal assumption for each input. Keep the quantity, construction and inspection scope the same when comparing alternatives. This uncalibrated planning model adds entered values; it contains no current market rates and does not issue a 勛圖tv quotation. You can contact the team without completing it.

勛圖tv ENGINEERING

Optional project allowance comparison

Panasonic Material Engineering
Loading Optional project allowance comparison…
Using this tool & sharing results

Budget outputs are planning scenarios. Check the included costs and rate assumptions; a confirmed quotation requires a review of your files and scope.

After changing inputs, update the result before using it. Where a download or copy action is available, review that brief and attach or paste it into your enquiry. Opening Contact does not transfer these inputs or send a request.

How to use and share tool results

Compare bonding products by function

The R-14T1 guide addresses a thermally conductive bonding-sheet route. Its supplied form and final interval should not be treated as identical to R-2400 film. Ask the material and fabrication teams to identify the proposed combination explicitly.

For a complete glass-composite thermal board, the ECOOL R-1787 page provides a separate construction discussion. A cured core's conductivity cannot be assigned to the film or used to predict local filling around heavy copper.

Panasonic R-2400 Film: worksheet boundary
Panasonic R-2400 Film: worksheet boundary. Original explanatory diagram; conceptual, not a released circuit or inspection record.

Retain the electrical and thermal boundaries

Insulation reliability and thermal performance must be evaluated together. A thinner residual dielectric can reduce thermal resistance while changing the electrical margin. Define the actual voltage, conductor geometry and required acceptance test.

For RF power circuitry, the XPEDION T1 guide adds the signal-path discussion. A thermal film introduced near an RF route requires electrical analysis; its heat-flow benefit does not automatically preserve impedance or loss.

Request a process review before committing the stackup

Send the exact film designation, technical-sheet revision, copper artwork, local heights, target bondline, board size and quantity. Include assembly history, insulation requirements and the intended thermal boundary conditions. State whether component embedding is part of the proposal.

The optional cost tool uses entered allowances only. Include process development, coupons and inspection if they are required by the proposed build. A quote and capability decision need review of the actual geometry; the calculator and public announcement cannot authorize production.

Review supplied form, local geometry and process together

A stackup is an agreement about physical construction, not just a vertical list of copper layers. Give each dielectric interval an identity and distinguish cured core thickness from the pressed thickness of bonding material. State whether copper is included in every quoted dimension.

Review the implications of a material change across impedance, lamination, drilling, registration and assembly exposure. A replacement with a similar headline Tg or Dk can still require a different geometry or process. Preserve the approved layer order, copper distribution assumptions and measurement basis with the manufacturing files.

Use the worksheet to organize a review, then obtain the fabricator's proposed construction and tolerances. Close differences before release. The final stackup, drawing and procurement material list should reference the same revision, especially when multiple suppliers or repeat orders are involved.

Bonding materials cannot be selected from a cured-laminate table alone. Establish whether the product is woven-glass prepreg, another reinforced bonding system or resin-coated copper. Each form has a different relationship between its supplied condition and the finished dielectric interval. Preserve the exact product and source revision in the proposed build.

Local copper distribution matters. Average coverage can conceal a large clearance region, a thick copper transition or a difficult target area. Supply the actual artwork and identify the locations that drive filling, registration or opening requirements. A single global thickness or aspect ratio does not characterize every local feature.

Process guidance should be applied by the responsible manufacturing team to the actual construction. A public document does not replace press-load qualification, handling controls or an approved drilling and metallization route. Do not use a generic bake or cure instruction for an unidentified bonding material.

Agree how the critical features will be verified. Representative cross-sections, dimensions and appropriate electrical or reliability evidence answer different questions. Keep the selected locations and acceptance requirements with the drawing so that a successful easy region is not mistaken for evidence about the most demanding feature.

Panasonic R-2400 Film: review sequence
Panasonic R-2400 Film: review sequence. Original explanatory diagram; conceptual, not a released circuit or inspection record.

Standards, source context and limits

Use the edition, amendment and material-document revision named in the purchase agreement. A standards title, marketing label or supplier product family does not establish that a particular lot meets a requirement. Public summaries are useful for scope; the controlled specification and applicable test method govern acceptance.

The examples on this page are illustrative engineering scenarios. They are not 勛圖tv production records or guaranteed material values. Source links identify the organizations responsible for the referenced information. Confirm applicability to the exact grade, construction and test condition before carrying a number into a drawing or qualification report. Sources were reviewed on 3 October 2026. A public catalog search is not proof that an unlisted product never existed. Where the exact designation or current technical sheet could not be verified, this page provides a clarification workflow rather than an invented material specification. Current supply, construction availability and qualification remain separate questions.

Panasonic R-2400 Film: inquiry handoff
Panasonic R-2400 Film: inquiry handoff. Original explanatory diagram; conceptual, not a released circuit or inspection record.

For fabrication scope and the agreed construction requirements, see PCB manufacturing.